I’m thinking not. In that it’s not obscene, meaning something that excites prurient interest.
Are you feeling any prurient interest? I know I’m not. Feel free to comment. She’s gone out of her way to make this and many other photos of her naked body available to us. She’s daring us NOT to find her prurient. If your boss comes and peeks over your shoulder and accuses you of watching porn on the job, repel him. Tell him, “This is no sexually attractive woman. She has breasts like a shaved nursing chimpanzee, droopy and anti-erotic. She has a tummy that would look pregnant if it were only firm rather than flabby. She has thighs like the liquefying concrete columns of a Hyatt hotel. Sure there’s a vagina somewhere between them, but who wants to bring the jackhammer to open the way? She has a face that not only could but probably has stopped a clock or a gross of them. Worse, we can’t even call watching her voyeurism. Us seeing her naked is all she lives for. That’s how pitiful and repugnant she is.”
Even women are tired of defending her. Here’s the saddest commentary of all.
I won’t say enjoy. You won’t. And I won’t apologize for sounding mean. It won’t matter to her. This is attention. What she lives for and can’t live without.
I truly wish it were otherwise.
-
Who is raising these self-centered zeros? And why do they garner any attention. She makes Snooki and Jwow look mature.
Yuk.
-
Oof. A little warning next time, chief? Wasn’t ready for that.
Yes, she’s gross. I haven’t been interested in seeing her even once. There are fat girls more attractive than Lena Dunham. She is completely repulsive. I had never heard of her before her creepy “first time” Obama commercial a couple of years ago. I assumed she was a dyke, though. Dykes love stuff like this. I mean I hope, for her sake, that she is.
Comments are now closed.
5 comments