Famous actresses who took pictures of themselves naked are now surprised that someone found and published the pictures. Really? Career boost on the way?
Both MSNBC and Fox News are chewing this to death. How tiresome and hypocritical can you get on both sides? MSNBC doesn’t want to objectify women. So let’s talk about how naked they are. Fox News doesn’t want to disrespect women. So let’s talk about how naked they are. Can we see the labia minora? Fox? MSNBC? Can we?
Where are the pictures? I’m happy to look at them. I gave up on Facebook long ago. They won’t let me quit their service, but they won’t let me look at naked stars, either. Pretty much like doing a full frontal nude privately to your 200 friends, eh? Tweet and delete. Posed pics never show the labia minora, anyway. The acid test.
Why is this an issue of any kind? Actresses do things to become stars. Anybody out there who doesn’t know that?
-
Lucky for us there were Polaroids in ancient times, yes?
This outrage on the part of the photographed “stars” (I’ve never heard of most of them but perhaps normal people have) is hilarious.
I went to the Twitter page of one of them, the one who said something like “Only scum would look at photos my husband and I took in the privacy of our home.” What was funny was that her political opinions there, put up before the photographs emerged, should have been twice as embarrassing to her as any labial shots. But of course they are not.
-
This is why I canceled cable. One reason, anyway.
Also, I’ve heard that if you don’t take nude pics of yourself, they can’t be posted online. Not sure if that’s true.
-
Reddit is supposed to have a giant list of the photos in question, but I can never find my way around in there. Someone under the age of 30 is going to have to field this one.
Comments are now closed.
4 comments